English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Separately, neither electromagnetic (EM) observations nor gravitational wave(GW) observations can distinguish between the $f(T)$ model and the $\Lambda$CDMmodel effectively. To break this degeneration, we simulate the GW measurementbased on the coming observation facilities, explicitly the Einstein Telescope.We make cross-validations between the simulated GW data and factual EM data,including the Pantheon, H(z), BAO and CMBR data, and the results show that theyare consistent with each other.  Anyway, the EM data itself have the $H_0$ tension problem which playscritical role in the distinguishable problem as we will see.  Our results show that the GW$+$BAO$+$CMBR data could distinguish the $f(T)$theory from the $\Lambda$CDM model in $2\sigma$ regime.

Distinguish the $f(T)$ model from $\Lambda$CDM model with Gravitational Wave observations