English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

There is a large discrepancy between results of Crystal Barrel and WA102 forthe branching ratio R = BR[eta2(1870)->a2(1320)pi]/BR[eta2(1870)->f2(1270)eta]. An extensive re-analysis of the Crystal Barreldata redetermines branching ratios for decays of eta2(1870), eta2(1645),eta2(2030) and f2(1910). This re-analysis confirms a small value for R of1.60+-0.39, inconsistent with the value 32.6+-12.6 of WA102. The likely originof the discrepancy is that the WA102 data contain a strong f2(1910)->a2-pisignal as well as eta2(1870). There is strong evidence that the eta2(1870) hasresonant phase variation. A peak in f2(1270)a0(980) confirms closely theparameters of the a2(2255) resonance observed previously. A peak ineta2(2030)-pi is interpreted naturally in terms of pi2(2245) with reducederrors for mass and width M=2285+-20(stat)+-25(syst) MeV,Gamma=250+-20(stat)+-25(syst) MeV.

A fresh look at eta2(1645), eta2(1870), eta2(2030) and f2(1910) in pbar-p -> eta + 3pizero