English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Dynamic compaction is commonly used to construct structural fills for various geo-infrastructures. Current practice is to specify a minimum dry density and moisture content criterion to be used in the field on the basis of Proctor compaction carried out in the laboratory. Nonetheless, we still do not have practical methods for predicting the compacted clay behaviour under expected mechanical and environmental loadings. Current theories are difficult to apply in practice due to difficulty in determining the necessary parameters. In this paper, the recently developed MPK framework is extended to cover dynamically compacted soils, with significant supporting experimental evidence. Two types of soils are used; lightly reactive kaolin and reactive Merri Creek clay. Since the compaction stress was unknown for dynamic compaction, recompression of soil specimens from compacted soil was used to establish the Loading Wetting State Boundary Surface (LWSBS). Independent tests showed that the framework can predict well the behaviour of compacted soils under loading/unloading and yielding, collapse during wetting, change of loading yield stress after wetting, and swelling pressure development during constrained wetting. The value of the approach is that the testing methods are straight-forward, do not require specialised equipment and the testing times are much shorter. In addition, the uncertainty that laboratory dynamic compaction may not relate directly to field roller compaction can be addressed with the developed framework. Soil specimens obtained from field soil pads compacted by actual rollers can be used to establish the LWSBS. This information will allow the prediction of the likely behaviour of field compacted fills under expected environmental and mechanical loadings under one-dimensional conditions. Extension to triaxial conditions would require further experimental work and theoretical modelling

Interpretation of the loading–wetting behaviour of compacted soils within the “MPK” framework. Part II: Dynamic compaction