English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Planarity, bipartiteness and (directed) acyclicity are basic graph properties with classic linear time recognition algorithms. However, the problems of testing whether a given (di)graph has k vertices whose deletion makes it planar, bipartite or a directed acyclic graph (DAG) are all fundamental NP-complete problems when k is part of the input. As a result, a significant amount of research has been devoted to understanding whether, for every fixed k, these problems admit a polynomial time algorithm (where the exponent in the polynomial is independent of k) and in particular, whether they admit linear time algorithms. While we now know that for any fixed k, we can test in linear time whether a graph is k vertices away from being planar [FOCS 2009, SODA 2014] or bipartite [SODA 2014, SICOMP 2016], the best known algorithms in the case of directed acyclicity are the algorithm of Garey and Tarjan [IPL 78] which runs in time O(nk−1 m) and the algorithm of Chen, Liu, Lu, O'Sullivan and Razgon [JACM 2008] which runs in time O(k!4kk4 nm). In other words, it has remained open whether it is possible to recognize in linear time, a graph which is 2 vertices away from being acyclic! In this paper, we settle this question by giving an algorithm that decides whether a given graph is k vertices away from being acyclic, in time O(k!4kk5(n + m)). That is, for every fixed k, our algorithm runs in time O(m + n), thus mirroring the case for planarity and bipartiteness. Our algorithm is designed via a general methodology that shaves off a factor of n from some algorithms that use the powerful technique of iterative compression. The two main features of our methodology are: (i) This is the first generic technique for designing linear time algorithms for directed cut-problems and (ii) it can be used in combination with future improvements in algorithms for the compression version of other well-studied cut-problems such as m ulticut and D irected S ubset F eedback V ertex S et .

When Recursion is Better than Iteration: A Linear-Time Algorithm for Acyclicity with Few Error Vertices