English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A retrospective case note survey of 103 autopsy proven cases of cerebral infarction was carried out to assess how often a cardiac source for embolism had been correctly suspected on clinical grounds. Only 61% of 46 patients with cardiac embolic sources were so identified. Cases of rheumatic heart disease and bacterial endocarditis were more frequently identified than cases of mural thromboembolism from ischaemic heart disease. This relative failure of unaided clinical diagnostic criteria probably accounts for the discrepancy between the autopsy evidence of cardiac embolism as a cause of stroke (about 40%), and clinical studies (about 20%).

How often can an embolic stroke be diagnosed clinically? A clinicopathological correlation