English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Previously, we reported that human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 E6 binds to C/H1, C/H3, and the C-terminal domains of coactivators p300 and CBP, causing the modulation of the transcription of certain genes controlled by NF-kappaB (p65 or relA) and p53. To establish the biological significance of these observations, we have focused on the transcriptional regulation of interleukin-8 (IL-8), a potent chemoattractant for T lymphocytes and neutrophils, which is also essential for the initiation of the local immune response. The IL-8 promoter is regulated by NF-kappaB/p65 in response to tumor necrosis factor alpha and requires the cooperation of the coactivators CBP/p300 and steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC-1) and the p300/CBP-associated factor (P/CAF) for optimal activation. Here we report that, in the presence of HPV-16 E6, the promoter activity of IL-8 was repressed. Moreover, from the mutational analysis of the IL-8 promoter, we found that E6 down-regulates the IL-8 promoter activity through the NF-kappaB/p65 binding site. This inhibition appears to result from the ability of HPV-16 E6 to compete with NF-kappaB/p65 and SRC-1 for binding to the N terminus and C terminus of CBP, respectively. Reporter data also showed that E7 represses IL-8 promoter activity, though to a lesser extent than E6 but, like E6, the repression by E7 is through the NF-kappaB/p65 binding site. E7 was shown for the first time to bind to P/CAF, and the binding was necessary for the down regulation of the IL-8 promoter. E6 and E7 together inhibited transcription of the IL-8 promoter to a greater extent than either alone. Finally, by RNase protection assay, we showed that the synthesis of endogenous IL-8 mRNA was repressed in keratinocytes stably expressing E6 and E7. Taken together, the results provide evidence that E6 and E7 can cooperatively disrupt IL-8 transcription through disruption of transcriptional active complexes, and this may have important consequences for immune responses in infected hosts.

Down Regulation of the Interleukin-8 Promoter by Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E6 and E7 through Effects on CREB Binding Protein/p300 and P/CAF