English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

VP16-H is an essential structural protein of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and is also a potent activator of virus immediate-early (IE) gene expression. Current models of functional determinants within VP16-H indicate that it consists of two domains, an N-terminal domain involved in recruiting VP16-H to a multicomponent DNA binding complex with two host proteins, Oct-1 and host cell factor (HCF), and an acidic C-terminal domain exclusively involved in transactivation. VP16-E, from equine herpesvirus 1 (EHV-1), exhibits strong conservation with the N-terminal domain of VP16-H but, with the exception of a short segment at the extreme C terminus, lacks almost the entire acidic C-terminal domain. Studies of key activation determinants within the C terminus of VP16-H would predict that VP16-E may activate poorly, if at all. However, VP16-E is a potent activator of both EHV-1 and HSV-1 IE gene transcription. We show that VP16-E does not follow the simple two-domain model of VP16-H. Thus, despite the conservation in the N-terminal domains, this region in VP16-E is not sufficient for assembly into the DNA binding complex with Oct-1 and HCF. The short conserved determinant close to the C terminus is completely dispensable in VP16-H but is absolutely required in VP16-E. In activation studies, the potency of intact VP16-E was not recapitulated in chimeric proteins in which it was fused with a GAL4 DNA binding domain. Furthermore, a chimeric protein consisting of the C-terminal region of VP16-E fused to the N-terminal domain of VP16-H, while able to promote complex formation, nevertheless exhibited very weak activation. These results indicate that the mode of recruitment of the activation domain, i.e., through complex formation with Oct-1 and HCF, may be crucial for activation and that key determinants required for activation in VP16-E, and possibly VP16-H, may involve interactions between regions of the C terminus and the N terminus rather than discrete domains with independent functions.

Differences in Determinants Required for Complex Formation and Transactivation in Related VP16 Proteins