English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We investigated the integration sites, infectivities, and expression of Rous-associated virus-0 (Rav-0) DNAs in exogenously infected turkey and chicken cells. Restriction endonuclease analyses of the DNAs of RAV-0-infected cells indicated that unique integration sites of RAV-0 DNA were detectable in clones of RAV-0-infected cells but not in mass-infected cell cultures. In addition, the sites of integration of RAV-0 DNA differed in each of the seven clones of RAV-0-infected cells examined. Thus, endogenous RAV-0 proviruses appeared to integrate at multiple sites in cellular DNA, which were distinct from the sites of integration of endogenous RAV-0 genomes. Since exogenous RAV-0 proviruses are expressed at 10(3)- to 10(4)-fold-higher levels and are 10(3)- to 10(4)-fold more infectious in transfection assays than the endogenous RAV-0 genome of uninfected V+ chicken cells, these results are consistent with the hypothesis that transcription of the endogenous RAV-0 genome is regulated by flanking cellular DNA sequences. Although all RAV-0-infected cells contained infectious RAV-0 DNA and produced high titers of RAV-0 compared with uninfected V+ cells, different clones of RAV-0 infected chicken cells differed by as much as 30-fold in their levels of virus production. The infectivity of the DNA of each clone of RAV-0-infected cells correlated with the amount of virus produced by that clone. However, these differences did not appear to be correlated either with the number of exogenous RAV-0 proviruses in different clones or with the infectivity of RAV-0 produced by different clones, indicating that differences either in modification of RAV-0 DNAs or in the cellular sequences flanking exogenous RAV-0 DNAs were responsible for the observed differences in expression and infectivity.

Integration, expression, and infectivity of exogenously acquired proviruses of Rous-associated virus-O