English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Although imipenem has in vitro activity against Enterococcus faecalis and Food and Drug Administration-approved indications for treatment of infections caused by this microorganism, there are no NCCLS guidelines for susceptibility testing of imipenem versus enterococci. Therefore, the in vitro activities of penicillin, ampicillin, imipenem, and vancomycin against 201 blood isolates of E. faecalis and 24 blood isolates of Enterococcus faecium were compared. The susceptibility of isolates to penicillin or ampicillin accurately predicted the in vitro activity of imipenem. Since the susceptibility of enterococci to imipenem can be predicted by the results obtained by testing of penicillin or ampicillin, testing of imipenem by clinical laboratories probably is not necessary.

journal of clinical microbiology

Comparative Evaluation of Penicillin, Ampicillin, and Imipenem MICs and Susceptibility Breakpoints for Vancomycin-Susceptible and Vancomycin-Resistant <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> and <i>Enterococcus faecium</i>

Comparative Evaluation of Penicillin, Ampicillin, and Imipenem MICs and Susceptibility Breakpoints for Vancomycin-Susceptible and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium