English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Two catalase-negative Listeria monocytogenes serovar 1/2b strains were isolated from listeriosis patients in 1995 in Germany. The infections appeared in individuals from different cities at different seasons and were caused by L. monocytogenes strains of different clonal types. In particular, the catalase reaction of one strain isolated from blood was consistently negative, whereas this reaction was only reversibly blocked when the strain was freshly isolated from ascitic fluid. After subculturing, the catalase-positive reaction was restored. Initially, identification of these isolates was difficult to achieve not only because of the lack of a catalase reaction, which generally distinguishes L. monocytogenes from other morphologically similar pathogenic gram-positive bacteria, but also because other routinely used biochemical tests such as CAMP and the commercial API test gave unclear results. However, rapid and unequivocal identification of these strains was possible by analyzing secretions of the p60 protein in culture supernatants by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or Western blot (immunoblot) analysis with our recently developed Listeria- and L. monocytogenes-specific anti-p60 antibodies. Additionally, the identifications were confirmed by Listeria- and L. monocytogenes-specific PCR analyses with primers derived from the iap, hly, and prfA genes. Immunoanalyses also allowed for the differentiation of these two strains, whereas no differentiation was possible by PCR when the internal, variable repetitive iap gene portion was analyzed. However, size variations of the PCR products comprising these gene portions which were obtained from a number of L. monocytogenes strains belonging to the same serotypes indicated that this type of PCR is not only useful for specific identifications but may be used in parallel as an additional marker for epidemiological studies. In conclusion, the data suggest that catalase production should not be taken as a strict criterion for the identification of listeriae. Furthermore, at least the infection caused by the stably catalase-negative strain supports the notion that catalase does not seem to be necessary for the intracellular growth of L. monocytogenes.

journal of clinical microbiology

Isolation of catalase-negative Listeria monocytogenes strains from listeriosis patients and their rapid identification by anti-p60 antibodies and/or PCR