z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Species Identification of Clinical Isolates of Anaerobic Bacteria: a Comparison of Two Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry Systems
Author(s) -
Ulrik Stenz Justesen,
Anette Holm,
Elisa Knudsen,
Line Bisgaard Andersen,
Thøger Gorm Jensen,
Michael Kemp,
Marianne Nielsine Skov,
Bente Gahrn-Hansen,
Jens Kjølseth Møller
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of clinical microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.349
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1070-633X
pISSN - 0095-1137
DOI - 10.1128/jcm.05788-11
Subject(s) - mass spectrometry , anaerobic bacteria , bacteria , identification (biology) , chromatography , matrix (chemical analysis) , microbiology and biotechnology , matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization , desorption , biology , chemistry , analytical chemistry (journal) , ecology , genetics , adsorption , organic chemistry
We compared two matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems (Shimadzu/SARAMIS and Bruker) on a collection of consecutive clinically important anaerobic bacteria (n = 290). The Bruker system had more correct identifications to the species level (67.2% versus 49.0%), but also more incorrect identifications (7.9% versus 1.4%). The system databases need to be optimized to increase identification levels. However, MALDI-TOF MS in its present version seems to be a fast and inexpensive method for identification of most clinically important anaerobic bacteria.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom