English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Recent reports have suggested that immunochromatographic tests (ICTs) have poor sensitivity for influenza A virus 2009 H1N1 (H1N1 09) infection on swabs ([2][1]) and nasopharyngeal washes ([1][2]), but they do have advantages, including short turnaround time, lack of hardware, and minimal validation

High Sensitivity of a Rapid Immunochromatographic Test for Detection of Influenza A Virus 2009 H1N1 in Nasopharyngeal Aspirates from Young Children