English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Rabbit and cow anti-Streptococcus dysgalactiae sera were tested by bacterial agglutination, complement fixation, hemagglutination, and immunodiffusion for the presence of antibody. The results of these tests were compared with mouse-protection studies on the same serum to estimate which in vitro test would best reflect the in vivo protective capacity of serum. Identification of the antibody constituents responsible for the mouse protection, hemagglutination, and complement fixation titers were established by reacting whole and diluted antisera with mercaptoethanol before and after testing. Results indicate that the complement fixation test may be a more accurate indicator of IgG protective bovine and rabbit antibody, whereas the hemagglutination test may more readily reflect a wider range of protective antibody levels and IgM. The complement fixation test showed some shared responses to IgG and IgM in both the rabbit and cow, whereas the IgM components seemed to be the predominant factor influencing hemagglutination titers in the rabbit and more so in the bovine. Mouse protection tests with mercaptoethanol-treated cow and rabbit sera indicate that the protective capacity of these antisera is shared between IgM and IgG components.

Estimation and Identification of Streptococcus dysgalactiae Protective Antibody in Sera of Rabbits and Cattle