English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We previously describedEscherichia coli mutator tRNAs that insert glycine in place of aspartic acid and postulated that the elevated mutation rate results from generating a mutator polymerase. We suggested that the proofreading subunit of polymerase III, ɛ, is a likely target for the aspartic acid-to-glycine change that leads to a lowered fidelity of replication, since the altered ɛ subunits resulting from this substitution (approximately 1% of the time) are sufficient to create a mutator effect, based on several observations ofmutD alleles. In the present work, we extended the study of specificmutD alleles and constructed 16 alteredmutD genes by replacing each aspartic acid codon, in series, with a glycine codon in thednaQ gene that encodes ɛ. We show that three of these genes confer a strong mutator effect. We have also looked for new mutator tRNAs and have found one: a glycine tRNA that inserts glycine at histidine codons. We then replaced each of the seven histidine codons in themutD gene with glycine codons and found that in two cases, a strong mutator phenotype results. These findings are consistent with the ɛ subunit playing a major role in the mutator effect of misreading tRNAs.

Examination of the Role of DNA Polymerase Proofreading in the Mutator Effect of Miscoding tRNAs