English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We have previously shown that the synthetic tetraacyl precursor Ia (compound 406, LA-14-PP, or lipid IVa) was not able to induce the production of tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-1, and interleukin-6 in human monocytes but strongly antagonized lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced formation of these monokines. This inhibition was detectable at the level of mRNA production. To achieve a better understanding of molecular basis of this inhibition, we investigated whether lipid A precursor Ia (LA-14-PP), Escherichia coli-type lipid A (LA-15-PP), Chromobacterium violaceum-type lipid A (LA-22-PP), and synthetic lipid A partial structures and analogs (LA-23-PP, LA-24-PP, and PE-4) were able to influence the binding of 125I-LPS to human monocytes and compared this inhibitory activity with the agonistic and antagonistic action in the induction of monokines in human monocytes. 125I-LPS (20 ng per well) was added to human monocytes in the presence or absence of unlabeled rough Re mutant-derived LPS (Re-LPS) or lipid A compounds, and specific LPS binding was determined after 7 h. This binding was found to be dependent on CD14 as shown by the use of an anti-CD14 monoclonal antibody. Compound LA-14-PP was found to inhibit the binding of 125I-LPS to the cells in a similar dose-response to that of unlabeled LPS. This shows that the inhibitory capacity on LPS binding does not correlate with the monokine-inducing capacity because Re-LPS is active in inducing tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-1, and interleukin-6, while LA-14-PP is not. The strong capacity of LA-14-PP to inhibit 125I-LPS binding, however, correlates with the strong inhibitory capacity of this compound on LPS-induced monokine production. Compounds LA-15-PP, LA-23-PP, and LA-24-PP were active in the inhibition of 125I-LPS binding but were 5- to 10-fold weaker than Re-LPS and LA-14-PP. Of all lipid A structures tested, compound LA-22-PP expressed the weakest inhibitory capacity on LPS binding. These compounds showed again that the activity of binding inhibition does not correlate with the monokine-inducing capacity. We assume that the inhibitory effects of lipid A partial structures on LPS-induced monokine production have their origin in a competitive inhibition between LPS and the lipid A partial structures for the same binding site on the cell membrane.

Modulation of endotoxin-induced monokine release in human monocytes by lipid A partial structures that inhibit binding of 125I-lipopolysaccharide