English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Soil was incubated with various species of bacteria, Bacillus subtilis, or Bacillus thuringiensis spores and crystals. These were added to serve as potential prey for indigenous, copper-resistant, nonobligate bacterial predators of bacteria in the soil. Alternatively, the soil was incubated with soluble nutrients or water only to cause potential indigenous prey cells to multiply so the predator cells would multiply. All of these incubation procedures caused excessive multiplication of some gram-negative bacteria in soil. Even greater multiplication, however, often occurred for certain copper-resistant bacterial predators of bacteria that made up a part of the gram-negative response. Incubation of the soil with copper per se did not give these responses. In most cases, the copper-resistant bacteria that responded were Cupriavidus necator, bacterial predator L-2, or previously unknown bacteria that resembled them. As was the case for C. necator and L-2, these new bacteria did not use glucose, had white colonies, produced copper-related growth initiation factor (GIF), and attacked B. thuringiensis spores on laboratory media. The results were different, however, when B. thuringiensis spores and crystals per se were added to the soil. The copper-resistant bacterial response in the soil did not, to any extent, include C. necator-like bacteria. Instead, the main copper-resistant bacterial predators that developed had yellow colonies and did not resemble C. necator or L-2 in other ways. They were not seen before, and they did not develop on the addition of B. subtilis spores to soil. Apparently, they could not produce a C. necator-like GIF. Nevertheless, they did respond very quickly to B. thuringiensis spores and crystals in soil, as if a GIF of some sort were involved. These results suggest that, under various conditions of soil incubation, gram-negative bacterial predators of bacteria multiply and that several copper-resistant types among them can be detected, counted, and isolated by plating dilutions of the soil onto media containing excess copper.

applied and environmental microbiology

Response in Soil of <i>Cupriavidus necator</i> and Other Copper-Resistant Bacterial Predators of Bacteria to Addition of Water, Soluble Nutrients, Various Bacterial Species, or <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> Spores and Crystals

Response in Soil of Cupriavidus necator and Other Copper-Resistant Bacterial Predators of Bacteria to Addition of Water, Soluble Nutrients, Various Bacterial Species, or Bacillus thuringiensis Spores and Crystals