English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Several poliovirus and coxsackievirus isolates from environmental sources were compared with laboratory strains to determine their rate of inactivation by chlorine. All viruses were tested for up to 1,000 min in the presence of an initial free residual chlorine level of ca. 0.4 mg/liter. Coxsackievirus B5 (CB-5) isolates were found to be more resistant to chlorine than coxsackievirus B4 (CB-4), followed by poliovirus 1, 2, and 3 in order of decreasing resistance to chlorine. Environmental isolates of CB-5 were more resistant than the laboratory strain tested, and for two strains 12 and 22% of the input virus was still infectious after 100 min in the presence of free residual chlorine. Although CB-4 isolates were less resistant to chlorine than CB-5 isolates, after 1,000 min of contact 0.01% of the input virus was still infectious. Except for CB-5 isolates, isolates from environmental sources did not appear to be more resistant to chlorine than laboratory strains. Viruses isolated at different phases during the preparation of drinking water were not more resistant to chlorine and must thus have been protected by other mechanisms.

Relative resistance to chlorine of poliovirus and coxsackievirus isolates from environmental sources and drinking water