English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Five commonly used methods of disintegrating bacterial cells were compared by use of Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas putrefaciens, and Streptococcus durans as the test organisms. These methods were: (i) sonic treatment, (ii) grinding, (iii) freezing and thawing, (iv) acetone-powder, and (v) toluene. Sonic treatment and grinding yielded more protein in the cell-free extracts than did the other methods. Likewise, the protease activities (micrograms of tyrosine liberated per milliliter of extract) of sonically disrupted and ground cell extracts on casein substrates were far greater than those in extracts from cells disintegrated by the other methods. When the specific activity was based on the amount of tyrosine liberated per milligram of protein in the extract, the acetone-powder method yielded the most active protease extract, whereas the extract obtained by sonic treatment was least active. Other methods yielded extracts with intermediate specific activity.

Comparison of Methods of Extracting Intracellular Proteases from Bacteria1