English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Previous studies have demonstrated that peptidic and nonpeptidic delta-opioid receptor agonists have different effects depending on the measure. For example, nonpeptidic delta-opioid agonists, but not peptidic agonists, produce convulsions in rats, and in vitro studies suggested that peptidic and nonpeptidic delta-opioid agonists might have differential mechanisms of receptor downregulation. The present study evaluated potential differences between peptidic and nonpeptidic delta-opioid agonists in their ability to activate G proteins using guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) autoradiography experiments in rat brain slices. The peptidic agonist [d-Pen(2),d-Pen(5)]-enkephalin and the nonpeptidic agonist (+)BW373U86 [(+)-4-[alpha(R)-alpha-[(2S,5R)-2,5-dimethyl-4-(2-propenyl)-1-piperazinyl]-(3-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide] demonstrated concentration-dependent increases in [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding that were attenuated by the delta-opioid antagonist naltrindole. (+)BW373U86 was more potent and efficacious than the peptidic agonist, and this difference remained consistent across brain regions where significant stimulation was observed. In addition, multiple delta-opioid compounds were evaluated for their agonist activity in this assay. These data suggested that differences between peptidic and nonpeptidic delta-opioid agonists in behavioral studies were most likely caused by differences in agonist efficacy. Finally, these data also revealed that [(35)S]GTPgammaS autoradiography could be used to compare efficacy differences among agonists across various brain regions in rat brain slices.

the journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics/the journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics

Comparison of Peptidic and Nonpeptidic δ-Opioid Agonists on Guanosine 5′-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPγS) Binding in Brain Slices from Sprague-Dawley Rats