English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In 1981, David Mermin described a cleverly simplified version of Bell'stheorem. It pointed out in a straightforward way that interpreting entanglementfrom a local realist point of view can be problematic. I propose here anextended version of Mermin's device that can actually be given a simple localrealist interpretation through a sample selection bias, and I argue that westill have no scientific reason to believe that the moon could possibly not bethere when nobody looks.

Quantum entanglement, fair sampling, and reality: Is the moon there when nobody looks?