English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Nowadays, it is commonly admitted that the experimental violation of Bell'sinequalities that was successfully demonstrated in the last decades by manyexperimenters, are indeed the ultimate proof of quantum physics and of itsability to describe the whole microscopic world and beyond. But the historicaland scientific story may not be envisioned so clearly: it starts with theoriginal paper of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) aiming at demonstratingthat the formalism of quantum theory is incomplete. It then goes through theworks of D. Bohm, to finally proceed to the famous John Bell's relationshipsproviding an experimental setup to solve the EPR paradox. In this communicationis proposed an alternative reading of this history, showing that modernexperiments based on correlations between light polarizations significantlydeviate from the original spirit of the EPR paper. It is concluded that currentexperimental violations of Bell's inequalities cannot be considered as anultimate proof of the completeness of quantum physics models.

Can violations of Bell's inequalities be considere as the final proof of quantum physics ?