English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

is reection article states that both the Court for Peace and the Justice Chambers of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace can be considered as sui generis jurisdictional institutions. ey have been built thanks to the evolution of the judicial instruments and institutions from international law for the ascription of criminal responsibilities in scenarios of serious human rights violations and thanks to the domestic experiences that Colombia has experienced in the area of transitional justice. e principles of preference and prevalence that govern as jurisdictional budgets have been created so that the Special Jurisdiction for Peace concentrates the competence of the cases associated with the armed conict, which previously corresponded to various jurisdictional and even disciplinary and scal institutions. is article aims to debate on the institutional nature of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace as a natural judge of the Colombian armed conict, highlighting several features of its jurisdictional institutions that differentiate it from other national judges and courts.

El Tribunal para la Paz y las Salas de Justicia de la JEP como órganos jurisdiccionales sui generis