English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

We investigate the question whether a scattered compact topological space  K  such thatC  (  K  )   $C(K)$    has a norming Markushevich basis (M‐basis, for short) must be Eberlein. This question originates from the recent solution, due to Hájek, Todorčević and the authors, to an open problem from the 1990s, due to Godefroy. Our prime tool consists in proving thatC  (   [  0  ,   ω  1   ]   )   $C([0,\omega _1])$    does not embed in a Banach space with a norming M‐basis, thereby generalising a result due to Alexandrov and Plichko. Subsequently, we give sufficient conditions on a compact  K  forC  (  K  )   $C(K)$    not to embed in a Banach space with a norming M‐basis. Examples of such conditions are that  K  is a zero‐dimensional compact space with a P‐point, or a compact tree of height at leastω  1   +  1   $\omega _1 +1$   . In particular, this allows us to answer the said question in the case when  K  is a tree and to obtain a rather general result for Valdivia compacta. Finally, we give some structural results for scattered compact trees; in particular, we prove that scattered trees of height less than ω 2  are Valdivia.

Banach spaces of continuous functions without norming Markushevich bases