English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

JURAJDA PAVEL, JANÁČ MICHAL, ROCHE KEVIN, MIKL LIBOR, ŠLAPANSKÝ LUDĚK, KRECHLER IVO, ADÁMEK ZDENĚK, JURAJDOVÁ ZDENKA, HALAČKA KAREL. 2018. Fish Communities of Five Drinking Water Reservoirs in the Morava River Basin. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 66(3): 655 – 663. While fish communities have been studied in Czech reservoirs for decades, monitoring has increased since implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive (2000 / 60 / EC). Despite this, many smaller drinking water reservoirs have yet to be surveyed. Between May and July 2016, we undertook a pilot‐study examining the fish communities of five Moravian reservoirs (Ludkovice, Bojkovice, Hubenov, Nová Říše and Landštejn). Fish were sampled using boat electrofishing along the littoral zone and Nordic gill nets in the pelagic zone. Both methods were evaluated separately and combined as CPUE and relative abundance and biomass ( %). Nineteen fish species and one hybrid were recorded, with roach Rutilus rutilus dominating overall by abundance, but carp Cyprinus carpio, pike Esox lucius and wels Silurus glanis dominating by biomass in electrofishing samples. Predatory species represented up to 60 % of biomass in the combined sample, with an F / C index ranging from 0.5 – 3, implying a high abundance of predators. Electrofishing tended to underestimate the abundance of bleak and ruffe, while gill nets underestimated the biomass of predatory species. In some reservoirs, the abundance of pike and wels was high (though it is difficult to say if these fish were stocked or the result of natural reproduction). In others (e.g. Landštejn), zander Sander lucioperca were not registered by either sampling method, despite intensive stocking. Overall, gill netting alone appears inadequate for gaining a true picture of the fish community in reservoirs and we suggest a combination of electrofishing and gill netting in future.