English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

ABSTRACT  The stability of the motion of planet satellites is considered in a model of the general three‐body problem (sun–planet–satellite). ‘Sundman surfaces’ are constructed, by means of which the concept of ‘Sundman stability’ is formulated. A comparison of Sundman stability with the results of Golubev’s  c  2  h  method and with Hill’s classical stability in the restricted three‐body problem is performed. The constructed Sundman stability regions in the plane of ‘energy–moment of momentum’ parameters coincides with the analogous regions obtained by Golubev’s method, with the value ( c  2  h ) cr .  Construction of Sundman surfaces in the three‐dimensional space of the specially selected coordinates  xyR  is carried out by means of the exact Sundman inequality in the general three‐body problem. Determination of the singular points of surfaces and regions of possible motion and Sundman stability analysis are implemented. It is shown that the singular points of the Sundman surfaces in the coordinate space  xyR  lie in different planes. The Sundman stability of all known natural satellites of planets is investigated. It is shown that a number of natural satellites that are stable according to Hill and also some satellites that are stable according to Golubev’s method are unstable in the sense of Sundman stability.

Sundman stability of natural planet satellites