English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The mass function  of molecular clouds and clumps is shallower than the mass function  of young star clusters, gas‐embedded and gas‐free alike, as their respective mass function indices are  β 0 ≃ 1.7  and  β ★ ≃ 2 . We demonstrate that such a difference can arise from different mass–radius relations for the embedded clusters and the molecular clouds (clumps) hosting them. In particular, the formation of star clusters with a constant mean  volume  density in the central regions of molecular clouds of constant mean  surface  density steepens the mass function from clouds to embedded clusters. This model is observationally supported since the mean surface density of molecular clouds is approximately constant, while there is a growing body of evidence, in both Galactic and extragalactic environments, that efficient star formation requires a hydrogen molecule number density threshold of   n  th ≃ 10 4−5  cm −3  .  Adopting power‐law volume density profiles of index  p  for spherically symmetric molecular clouds (clumps), we define two zones within each cloud (clump): a central cluster‐forming region, actively forming stars by virtue of a local number density higher than  n  th , and an outer envelope inert in terms of star formation. We map how much the slope of the cluster‐forming region mass function differs from that of their host clouds (clumps) as a function of their respective mass–radius relations and of the cloud (clump) density index. We find that for constant surface density clouds with density index   p ≃ 1.9 , a cloud mass function of index  β 0 = 1.7  gives rise to a cluster‐forming region mass function of index  β≃ 2 . Our model equates with defining two distinct star formation efficiencies (SFEs): a global mass‐varying SFE averaged over the whole cloud (clump), and a local mass‐independent SFE measured over the central cluster‐forming region. While the global SFE relates the mass function of clouds to that of embedded clusters, the local SFE rules cluster evolution after residual star‐forming gas expulsion. That the cluster mass function slope does not change through early cluster evolution implies a mass‐independent local SFE and, thus, the same mass function index for cluster‐forming regions and embedded clusters, that is  β=β ★  . Our model can therefore reproduce the observed cluster mass function index  β ★ ≃ 2 .  For the same model parameters, the radius distribution also steepens from clouds (clumps) to embedded clusters, which contributes to explaining observed cluster radius distributions.

From the molecular‐cloud‐ to the embedded‐cluster‐mass function with a density threshold for star formation