English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Precession in an accretion‐powered pulsar is expected to produce characteristic variations in the pulse properties. Assuming surface intensity maps with one and two hotspots, we compute theoretically the periodic modulation of the mean flux, pulse‐phase residuals and fractional amplitudes of the first and second harmonic of the pulse profiles. These quantities are characterized in terms of their relative precession phase offsets. We then search for these signatures in 37 d of X‐ray timing data from the accreting millisecond pulsar XTE J1814−338. We analyse a 12.2‐d modulation observed previously and show that it is consistent with a freely precessing neutron star only if the inclination angle is , an a priori unlikely orientation. We conclude that if the observed flux variations are due to precession, our model incompletely describes the relative precession phase offsets (e.g. the surface intensity map is oversimplified). We are still able to place an upper limit on ε of  3.0 × 10 −9   independently of our model, and estimate the phase‐independent tilt angle θ to lie roughly between 5° and 10°. On the other hand, if the observed flux variations are not due to precession, the detected signal serves as a firm upper limit for any underlying precession signal. We then place an upper limit on the product  ε cos θ  of  ≤9.9 × 10 −10  . The first scenario translates into a maximum gravitational wave strain of 10 −27  from XTE J1814−338 (assuming a distance of 8 kpc), and a corresponding signal‐to‐noise ratio of  ≤10 −3   (for a 120 d integration time) for the advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational‐Wave Observatory ground‐based gravitational wave detector.

Does the accreting millisecond pulsar XTE J1814−338 precess?