English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Numerical simulations with self‐similar initial and boundary conditions provide a link between theoretical and numerical investigations of jet dynamics. We perform axisymmetric resistive magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations for a generalized solution of the Blandford &amp; Payne type, and compare them with the corresponding analytical and numerical ideal MHD solutions. We disentangle the effects of the numerical and physical diffusivity. The latter could occur in outflows above an accretion disc, being transferred from the underlying disc into the disc corona by MHD turbulence (anomalous turbulent diffusivity), or as a result of ambipolar diffusion in partially ionized flows. We conclude that while the classical magnetic Reynolds number  R  m  measures the importance of resistive effects in the induction equation, a new introduced number,   R  β = (β/2) R  m   with β the plasma beta, measures the importance of the resistive effects in the energy equation. Thus, in magnetized jets with β &lt; 2, when   R  β ≲ 1  resistive effects are non‐negligible and affect mostly the energy equation. The presented simulations indeed show that for a range of magnetic diffusivities corresponding to   R  β ≳ 1 , the flow remains close to the ideal MHD self‐similar solution.

Resistive jet simulations extending radially self‐similar magnetohydrodynamic models