English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

NGC 253 is a local, starbursting spiral galaxy with strong X‐ray emission from hot gas, as well as many point sources. We have conducted a spectral survey of the X‐ray population of NGC 253 using a deep  XMM–Newton  observation. NGC 253 only accounts for ∼20 per cent of the  XMM–Newton  EPIC field of view, allowing us to identify ∼100 X‐ray sources that are unlikely to be associated with NGC 253. Hence, we were able to make a direct estimate of contamination from, for example, foreground stars and background galaxies.  X‐ray luminosity functions (XLFs) of galaxy populations are often used to characterize their properties. There are several methods for estimating the luminosities of X‐ray sources with few photons. We have obtained spectral fits for the brightest 140 sources in the 2003  XMM–Newton  observation of NGC 253, and compare the best‐fitting luminosities of those 69 non‐nuclear sources associated with NGC 253 with luminosities derived using other methods. We find the luminosities obtained from these various methods to vary systematically by a factor of up to 3 for the same data; this is largely due to differences in absorption. We therefore conclude that assuming Galactic absorption is probably unwise; rather, one should measure the absorption for the population.  A remarkable correlation has been reported between the XLFs of galaxies and their star formation rates. However, the XLFs used in that study were obtained using several different methods. If the sample galaxies were revisited and a single method were applied, then this correlation may become stronger still.  In addition, we find that standard estimations of the background contribution to the X‐ray sources in the field are insufficient. We find that the background active galactic nuclei (AGN) may be systematically more luminous than previously expected. However, the excess in our measured AGN XLF with respect to the expected XLF may be due to an as yet unrecognized population associated with NGC 253.

A multi‐coloured survey of NGC 253 with XMM–Newton : testing the methods used for creating luminosity functions from low‐count data