z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Spectres of Marxism: a comment on Mike Savage's market model of class difference
Author(s) -
Toscano Alberto,
Woodcock Jamie
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
the sociological review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.743
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1467-954X
pISSN - 0038-0261
DOI - 10.1111/1467-954x.12295
Subject(s) - proletariat , class analysis , neoliberalism (international relations) , sociology , financialization , argument (complex analysis) , class (philosophy) , context (archaeology) , working class , power (physics) , capitalism , epistemology , neoclassical economics , inequality , positive economics , social science , economics , political science , politics , law , philosophy , history , market economy , mathematical analysis , biochemistry , chemistry , physics , mathematics , archaeology , quantum mechanics
This article is a critique of Mike Savage's ‘From the “problematic of the proletariat” to a class analysis of the “wealth elites”’. It first rejects the notion of the ‘problematic of the proletariat’ – the importance of a dividing line between the working and middle class – instead situating the argument within contemporary debates on class analysis. The critique introduces the broader context of neoliberalism and financialization, alongside a consideration of class globally. It stresses the importance of exploitation for understanding class and inequality, rather than moving to the notion of ‘advantage’, as proposed by Savage, which expels an understanding of power. While the focus on elites in class analysis is welcomed, it is argued that there is a continuing interdependence between classes and that race and gender must also be considered.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom