English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Today's cyberdefense tools are mostly watchers. They are not active doers. To be sure, watching is a demanding affair also. These tools monitor traffic and events; detect malicious signatures, patterns, and anomalies; may classify and characterize what they observe; and issue alerts. They might even learn while doing all this. But they don't act. They do little to plan and execute responses to attacks, and they do not plan and execute recovery activities. Response and recovery-core elements of cyber resilience&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;-are left to human cyberanalysts, incident responders, and system administrators. A recent report&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; reviews the implications of artificial intelligence for cybersecurity and offers no examples of its applications to response and recovery.

Doers, Not Watchers: Intelligent Autonomous Agents Are a Path to Cyber Resilience