English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Visual and force feedback are common elements in rehabilitation robotics, but visual feedback is difficult to provide in over-ground mobile exoskeleton systems. This letter aims to provide a method to integrate visual feedback using an augmented reality HoloLens headset with our mobile C-ALEX system. A preliminary study was carried out to assess the effects of providing force-only (Haptic), force and visual (HoloHapt) or visual (Visual) feedback to three independent groups, each containing eight participants. The groups showed an increase in normalized step height, nSH (HoloHapt: 1.10 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\pm$</tex-math></inline-formula> 0.13, Haptic: 1.03 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\pm$</tex-math></inline-formula> 0.23 Visual: 1.61 <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\pm$</tex-math></inline-formula> 0.52) and decreased normalized trajectory tracking error, TE (HoloHapt: 42.8% <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\pm$</tex-math></inline-formula> 23.4%, Haptic: 47.6% <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\pm$</tex-math></inline-formula> 18.4%, <bold>Visual: 114 .2 % <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\pm$</tex-math></inline-formula> 60.0 %</bold>). Visual nSH differed significantly from HoloHapt and Haptic nSH (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$p< 0.005$</tex-math></inline-formula>). Lap-wise normalized tracking error differed significantly (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$p < 0.005$</tex-math></inline-formula>) within participants. The results show the feasibility of and differences between each form of feedback for overground gait training. This information is useful for future studies targeted at patients with gait impairments.

Walking With Augmented Reality: A Preliminary Assessment of Visual Feedback With a Cable-Driven Active Leg Exoskeleton (C-ALEX)