English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Spatial decomposition is a popular basis for parallelising code. Cast in the frame of task parallelism, calculations on a spatial domain can be treated as a task. If neighbouring domains interact and share results, access to the specific data needs to be synchronized to avoid race conditions. This is the case for a variety of applications, like most molecular dynamics and many computational fluid dynamics codes. Here we present an unexpected problem which can occur in dependency-driven task parallelization models like StarSs: the tasks accessing a specific spatial domain are treated as interdependent, as dependencies are detected automatically via memory addresses. Thus, the order in which tasks are generated will have a severe impact on the dependency tree. In the worst case, a complete serialization is reached and no two tasks can be calculated in parallel. We present the problem in detail based on an example from molecular dynamics, and introduce a theoretical framework to calculate the degree of serialization. Furthermore, we present strategies to avoid this unnecessary problem. We recommend treating these strategies as best practice when using dependency-driven task parallel programming models like StarSs on such scenarios.

Avoiding Serialization Effects in Data / Dependency Aware Task Parallel Algorithms for Spatial Decomposition