English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Studies on software evolution explore code churn and code velocity at the abstraction level of a company or an entire project. We argue that this approach misses the differences among abstractions layers and subsystems of large projects. We conduct a case study on four BSD family operating systems: DragonFlyBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD, to investigate the evolution of code churn and code velocity across kernel and non-kernel code. We mine commits for characteristics such as annual growth rate, commit types, change type ratio, and size taxonomy, indicating code churn. Likewise, we investigate code velocity in terms of code review periods, i.e., time-to-first-response, time-to-accept, and time-to-merge.Our study provides evidence that software evolves differently at abstraction layers: kernel and non-kernel. The study finds similarities in the code base growth rate and distribution of commit types (neutral, additive, and subtractive) across BSD subsystems, however, (a) most commits contain either kernel or non-kernel code, (b) kernel commits are larger than non-kernel commits, and (c) code reviews for kernel code take longer than non-kernel code.

Is Kernel Code Different From Non-Kernel Code? A Case Study of BSD Family Operating Systems