English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Enterprise workloads usually call for an uptime service level agreement (SLA) at the pain of contractual penalty in the event of slippage. Often, the strategy is to introduce ad-hoc HA (High Availability) mechanisms in response. Implemented solutions that we surveyed do not mathematically map their availability model to the required uptime SLA and to any expected penalty payout. In most client cases that we observed, this either resulted in an over-engineered solution that had more redundancies than was required, or in an inadequate solution that could potentially slip on the system uptime SLA stipulated in the contract. In this paper, we propose a framework backed by a model, to automatically determine the HA-enabled solution with the least TCO (total cost of ownership) for a given uptime SLA and slippage penalty. We attempt to establish that our work is best implemented as a brokered service that recommends an uptime-optimized cloud architecture.

Uptime-Optimized Cloud Architecture as a Brokered Service