English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

High-density wireless video sensor nodes (VSNs) having limited battery power are deployed randomly in the disaster-hit area for capturing visual data, but its local processing and transmission consume high energy. High deployment density of those VSNs results in a larger overlap in the coverage area across VSNs that can be utilized to cover the sensing region of some VSNs and shut off such VSNs to decrease energy consumption and increase network lifetime without losing much area coverage. Two advanced approaches (APP_5 and APP_6) with realistic 3D rectangular pyramid camera coverage of VSN monitoring 2D target area is proposed in this paper. These approaches reduce the number of active VSNs in the target area and energy consumption maintaining the overall coverage area above some threshold value ensuring network connectivity. The approaches are compared with the three state-of-the-art approaches EX_1, EX_2 and EX_3 in the same simulation setup. Observed that for 150 deployed VSNs over the target area of size 75&#x00D7;75 square meters, APP_5 and APP_6 reduce energy consumption by 6.98% and 18.6% respectively from the existing approach EX_3 (producing a better result among three existing approaches in terms of energy consumption). Reducing the number of active VSNs helps decrease energy consumption at the expense of reduced area coverage. For the same node density, both APP_5 and APP_6 lose a little amount of area coverage (i.e. 0.93% and 0.95%) than the existing approach EX_2 (producing a better result among three existing approaches in terms of percentage of area coverage). Additionally, both the proposed approaches (having the same communication overhead) establish superiority by 3.19%/7.83%/4.25% from EX_1/EX_2/(EX_3) in terms of communication overhead for 100 deployed VSNs on the same target area. Finally, APP_6 substantiates superiority in terms of reduced energy consumption (11.97%) than APP_5 losing a very little percentage (0.02%) of area coverage for 150 deployed VSNs.

Coverage Aware Scheduling Strategies for 3D Wireless Video Sensor Nodes to Enhance Network Lifetime