English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Purpose. In this study, we want to identify current possible causes forciting and referencing errors in scholarly literature to compare if somethingchanged from the snapshot provided Sweetland in his 1989 paper.Design/methodology/approach. We analysed reference elements, i.e. bibliographicreferences, mentions, quotations, and respective in-text reference pointers,from 729 articles published in 147 journals across the 27 subject areas.Findings. The outcomes of our analysis pointed out that bibliographic errorshave been perpetuated for decades and that their possible causes haveincreased, despite the encouraged use of technological facilities, i.e., thereference managers. Originality. As far as we know, our study is the bestrecent available analysis of errors in referencing and citing practices in theliterature since Sweetland (1989).

journal of documentation

An analysis of citing and referencing habits across all scholarly  disciplines: approaches and trends in bibliographic referencing and citing  practices