English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We would like to point out the following minor corrections in our recently published paper. (i) In Fig. 3, the L’s used in the axis labels and hence in the scaling are the actual system size divided by a numerical factor of 32. For example, for an actual system of size 2048, the L used in scaling width time is 64 and not 2048. This change does not affect the scaling behavior, of course. (ii) On page 3558, first column, the sentence “The kinetic parameters are chosen to be k2 0.5, k3 1.0 for the pushed model and k2 0, k1 0.1 for the pulled model” should read “The kinetic parameters are chosen to be k2 0.5, k3 1.0 for the pushed model and k2 1, k1 0.1 for the pulled model.” (iii) On page 3557, in Eq. (4) as well as in the paragraph containing it, k1, k2, and k3 should be replaced by k 0 1, k0 2, and k 0 3, respectively. The relationships between the primed and the unprimed rates are k 0 1 k1, k 0 2 k2 2 k1, and k0 3 k2 1 k3.

physical review letters

Erratum: Fluctuation and Relaxation Properties of Pulled Fronts: A Scenario for Nonstandard Kardar-Parisi-Zhang Scaling [Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3556 (2000)]