English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In their recent work Sheinman et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 098104 (2015)]introduce a variation of percolation which they call no-enclaves percolation(NEP). The main claims are 1) the salient physics captured in NEP is closer towhat happens experimentally; 2) The Fisher exponent of NEP, is $\tau=1.82(1)$;3) Due to the different Fisher exponent, NEP constitutes a universality classdistinct from random percolation (RP). While we fully agree with 1) and foundNEP to be a very interesting variation of random percolation, we disagree with2) and 3). We will demonstrate that $\tau$ is exactly $2$, directly derivablefrom RP, and thus there is no foundation of a new universality class.

Comment on "Anomalous Discontinuity at the Percolation Critical Point of Active Gels"