English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In lieu of abstract, first paragraph reads: Galimzyanov et al. [1] find thatline tension between thick liquid-ordered ($L_{o}$) and thinnerliquid-disordered ($L_{d}$) registered lipid bilayer phases is minimised by anasymmetric "slip region", length $L\!\sim\!5\,\textrm{nm}$ (Fig. 1). They claimthat line tensions alone explain domain registration, without "direct"(area-dependent) inter-leaflet interaction [2,3]. We show this is unfounded,without direct interaction their results would predict\textit{antiregistration}, dependent on composition. To find equilibrium fromline energies, line \textit{tensions} must be combined with interfacial lengthsfor given states at given composition. This was not done in [1].

Comment on "Elastic Membrane Deformations Govern Interleaflet Coupling of Lipid-Ordered Domains"