English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

A recent interesting paper [Yucesoy et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 177204(2012), arXiv:1206:0783] compares the low-temperature phase of the 3DEdwards-Anderson (EA) model to its mean-field counterpart, theSherrington-Kirkpatrick (SK) model. The authors study the overlap distributionsP_J(q) and conclude that the two models behave differently. Here we notice thata similar analysis using state-of-the-art, larger data sets for the EA model(generated with the Janus computer) leads to a very clear interpretation of theresults of Yucesoy et al., showing that the EA model behaves as predicted bythe replica symmetry breaking (RSB) theory.

Comment on "Evidence of Non-Mean-Field-Like Low-Temperature Behavior in the Edwards-Anderson Spin-Glass Model"