English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We endorse the comment on our recent paper [En{\ss}lin and Weig, Phys. Rev. E82, 051112 (2010)] by Iatsenko, Stefanovska and McClintock [Phys. Rev. E 85033101 (2012)] and we try to clarify the origin of the apparent controversy ontwo issues. The aim of the minimal Gibbs free energy approach to provide asignal estimate is not affected by their Comment. However, if one wants toextend the method to also infer the a posteriori signal uncertainty anytempering of the posterior has to be undone at the end of the calculations, asthey correctly point out. Furthermore, a distinction is made here betweenmaximum entropy, the maximum entropy principle, and the so-called maximumentropy method in imaging, hopefully clarifying further the second issue oftheir Comment paper.

Reply to "Comment on `Inference with minimal Gibbs free energy in information field theory'" by Iatsenko, Stefanovska and McClintock