English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In the Comment on "Can accretion disk properties observationally distinguishblack holes from naked singularities?", by Bertrand Chauvineau, Phys. Rev. D{\bf 98}, 088501 (2018), the author did show that the metric used in Z.Kov\'{a}cs and T. Harko, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 82}, 124047 (2010), and initiallyintroduced in K. D. Krori and D. R. Bhattacharjee, J. Math. Phys. \textbf{23},637 (1982) and K. K. Nandi, P. M. Alsing, J. C. Evans, and T. B. Nayak, Phys.Rev. D \textbf{63}, 084027 (2001), does not satisfy the Einstein gravitationalfield equations with a minimally coupled scalar field. In our reply we wouldlike to point out that this result is actually not new, but it was alreadypublished in the literature. Moreover, a rotating solution that generalizes theKerr metric for a nonminimally coupled scalar field does exist. We brieflydiscuss the nature of the singularities for the generalized metric, and pointout that it can be used as a testing ground to differentiate black holes fromnaked singularities. We also mention the existence of some other typing ortechnical errors existing in the literature.

Reply to "Comment on 'Can accretion disk properties observationally distinguish black holes from naked singularities?'"