English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article presents the compatibility of experimental data from neutrinooscillation experiments with a high-$\dmsq$ two-neutrino oscillationhypothesis. Data is provided by the Bugey, Karlsruhe Rutherford Medium EnergyNeutrino Experiment 2 (KARMEN2), Los Alamos Liquid Scintillator NeutrinoDetector (LSND), and MiniBooNE experiments. The LSND, KARMEN2, and MiniBooNEresults are 25.36% compatible within a two-neutrino oscillation hypothesis.However, the point of maximal compatibility is found in a region that isexcluded by the Bugey data. A joint analysis of all four experiments, performedin the $\sinsqtheta \mathrm{vs} \dmsq$ region common to all data, finds amaximal compatibility of 3.94%. This result does not account for additions tothe neutrino oscillation model from sources such as CP violation or sterileneutrinos.

Compatibility of high-$\Delta \mathrm{m}^2$ $\nue$ and $\nuebar$ neutrino oscillation searches