English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

First hidden-charm pentaquark candidate with strangeness, $P_{\psis}^\Lambda(4338)$, was recently discovered in $B^-\to J/\psi\Lambda\bar{p}$ bythe LHCb Collaboration. $P_{\psi s}^\Lambda(4338)$ shows up as a bump at the$\Xi_c\bar{D}$ threshold in the $J/\psi\Lambda$ invariant mass($M_{J/\psi\Lambda}$) distribution. The $M_{J/\psi\Lambda}$ distribution alsoshows a large fluctuation at the $\Lambda_c\bar{D}_s$ threshold, hinting theexistence of a possible $P_{\psi s}^\Lambda(4255)$. In this work, we determinethe $P_{\psi s}^\Lambda(4338)$ and $P_{\psi s}^\Lambda(4255)$ pole positionsfor the first time. For this purpose, we fit a $B^-\to J/\psi\Lambda\bar{p}$model to the $M_{J/\psi\Lambda}$, $M_{J/\psi\bar{p}}$, $M_{\Lambda\bar{p}}$,and $\cos\theta_{K^*}$ distributions from the LHCb simultaneously; $\chi^2/{\rmndf}\sim 1.21$. Then we extract $P_{\psi s}^\Lambda$ poles from a unitary$\Xi_c\bar{D}$-$\Lambda_c\bar{D}_s$ coupled-channel scattering amplitude builtin the model. In our default fit, the $P_{\psi s}^\Lambda(4338)$ pole is foundat $( 4338.2\pm 1.4)-( 1.9\pm 0.5 )\,i$ MeV while the $P_{\psis}^\Lambda(4255)$ pole at $4254.7\pm 0.4$ MeV. The $P_{\psi s}^\Lambda(4338)$and $P_{\psi s}^\Lambda(4255)$ are mostly $\Xi_c \bar{D}$ bound and$\Lambda_c\bar{D}_s$ virtual states, respectively. Through our analysis, thedata disfavors a hypothesis of $P_{\psi s}^\Lambda(4338)$ as merely akinematical effect. This pole determination, which is important in its ownright, sets a primary basis to study the nature of the $P_{\psi s}^\Lambda$states.

Pole determination of $P_{\psi s}^\Lambda(4338)$ and possible $P_{\psi s}^\Lambda(4255)$ in $B^-\to J/\psi\Lambda\bar{p}$