English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We present a mechanism for $\Omega_c \to \pi^+ \Omega(2012)$ productionthrough an external emission Cabibbo favored weak decay mode, where the$\Omega(2012)$ is dynamically generated from the interaction of$\bar{K}\Xi^*(1530)$, $\eta\Omega$, with $\bar{K}\Xi$ as the main decaychannel. The $\Omega(2012)$ decays later to $\bar{K}\Xi$ in this picture, withresults compatible with Belle data. The picture has as a consequence that onecan evaluate the direct decay $\Omega_c^0 \to \pi^+K^- \Xi^0$ and the decay$\Omega_c^0 \to \pi^+\bar{K} \Xi^*$, $\pi^+\eta\Omega$ with direct coupling of$\bar{K}\Xi^*$ and $\eta\Omega$ to $K^- \Xi^0$. We show that, withinuncertainties and using data from a recent Belle measurement, all these threechannels account for about (12-20)\% of the total $\Omega_c \to \pi^+K^- \Xi^0$decay rate. The consistency of the molecular picture with all the data isestablished by showing that $\Omega_c \to \Xi^0 \bar{K}^{*0} \to \Xi^0K^-\pi^+$ together with $\Omega_c \to \pi^+ \Omega^* \to \pi^+K^- \Xi^0 $ accountfor about 85\% of the total $\Omega_c \to \pi^+K^- \Xi^0 $.

physical review. d/physical review. d.

Interpretation of the $\Omega_c \to \pi^+ \Omega(2012) \to \pi^+(\bar{K}  \Xi)$ relative to $\Omega_c \to \pi^+\bar{K} \Xi$ from the $\Omega(2012)$  molecular perspective