English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Accurate parameter estimation is key to maximizing the scientific impact of gravitational-wave astronomy. Parameters of a binary merger are typically estimated using Bayesian inference. It is necessary to make several assumptions when doing so, one of which is that the the detectors output stationary Gaussian noise. We test the validity of these assumptions by performing percentile-percentile tests in both simulated Gaussian noise and real detector data in the first observing run of Advanced LIGO (O1). We add simulated signals to 512s of data centered on each of the three events detected in O1 -- GW150914, GW151012, and GW151226 -- and check that the recovered credible intervals match statistical expectations. We find that we are able to recover unbiased parameter estimates in the real detector data, indicating that the assumption of Gaussian noise does not adversely effect parameter estimates. However, we also find that both the parallel-tempered emcee sampler emcee_pt and the nested sampler dynesty struggle to produced unbiased parameter estimates for GW151226-like signals, even in simulated Gaussian noise. The emcee_pt sampler does produce unbiased estimates for GW150914-like signals. This highlights the importance of performing percentile-percentile tests in different targeted areas of parameter space.

Reliability of parameter estimates in the first observing run of Advanced LIGO