English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

By using 14 different versions and parametrizations of a proximity potentialand two new versions of the potential proposed in this paper, we perform acomparative study of fusion barriers by studying 26 symmetric reactions. Themass asymmetry $\eta_{A}$ = $(\frac{A_{2}-A_{1}}{A_{2}+A_{1}}),$ however, isvery large. Our detailed investigation reveals that most of the proximitypotentials reproduce experimental data within $\pm$8% on the average. Acomparison of fusion cross sections indicates that Bass 80, AW 95, and DenisovDP potentials have a better edge than other potentials. We also propose newversions of the proximity potential as well as Denisov parametrized potential.These new versions improve the agreement with the data.

A systematic study of the fusion barriers using different proximity type potentials for $N = Z$ colliding nuclei : New extensions