English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We investigate whether the apparent discrepancy between proton electric formfactor from measurements using the Rosenbluth separation technique andpolarization transfer method is due to the standard approximations employed inradiative correction procedures. Inaccuracies due to both the peakingapproximation and the soft-photon approximation have been removed in oursimulation approach. In contrast to results from (e,e'p) experiments, we findthem in this case to be too small to explain the discrepancy.

Improved radiative corrections and proton charge form factor from the Rosenbluth separation technique