English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We find that collective flow model which can successfully analyze chargedparticle distributions at AGS and lower SPS (less than 20Gev/n). but fails toanalyze that of at RHIC. The tails of distribution of charged particle at RHIChas a jump from the collective flow model calculation as the energy increases.Thermalization Component Model is presented based on collective flow to studythe multiplicity distributions at RHIC in this paper. It is realized that theregion of phase space of collective flow can reflect that of thermalizationregion. By comparing the contributions of particle productions fromthermalization region at different energies and different centralities, we candeepen our study on the feature of collective movement at RHIC.  Keywords: Thermalization, Thermalization component model

physical review. c. nuclear physics/physical review. c, nuclear physics

Thermalization component model of multiplicity distributions of charged  hadrons at BNL($E^{lab}_{NN}=2-11.6GeV/c$), the  CERN($E^{lab}_{NN}=20-200GeV/c$), and the BNL ($\sqrt{s_{NN}}=19.6-200 GeV$)